In a wave of AI‑powered surveillance, companies are deploying algorithms that track employee productivity, location, and even emotional states. While firms tout efficiency gains, the practice raises serious legal and ethical questions about privacy, consent, and workplace autonomy.

Workers and civil‑rights groups argue that continuous monitoring erodes trust and fuels a culture of fear. Legal experts warn that such systems may violate labor laws, data protection regulations, and the right to a private life, especially when data is shared with third parties or used for punitive decisions.

The debate underscores the need for transparent policies, robust oversight, and worker representation in shaping surveillance practices. Accountability mechanisms—such as independent audits and clear redress pathways—are essential to ensure that technology serves people, not just corporate profit.

Source: observer.com